Micro-cost analysis of reusable vs. single-use cystoscopy in a single-payer healthcare system
Jaehoon Kim1, Bruce Gao1, Kevin C. Zorn2, Naeem Bhojani2, Bilal Chughtai3, Dean Elterman1.
1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; 3Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
Introduction: Single-use flexible diagnostic cystoscopy has recently been developed with comparable functionality to reusable cystoscopes. Prior studies have demonstrated considerable contribution of upfront costs of reusable cystoscopy. The objective of this study was to compare costs of reusable cystoscopy to single-use cystoscopy in a single-payer, socialized healthcare system.
Methods: A retrospective micro-cost analysis of reusable cystoscopy in a single institution was performed. The cost analysis was divided into capital, maintenance, reprocessing, and labor. Costs were amortized over five- and 10-year basis as appropriate. The results were compared to theoretical costs of single-use cystoscopes.
Results: There were 3415 annual average cystoscopy cases, with 171 cases per reusable cystoscope. The capital, maintenance, reprocessing, and labor costs of reusable cystoscopy are $96 000, $99 867, $247 855, and $65 317, respectively. The total annual costs per case for reusable and single-use cystoscopy are $149.06 and $245.57, respectively. The costs of reusable cystoscopy decreases with the number of procedures per year, and intersect the costs of single-use cystoscopes at 1265 procedures per year (Figure 1). All costs are in $CAD.
Conclusions: The cost effectiveness of reusable cystoscopes is dependent on cystoscopy volume due to considerable upfront costs. Single-use cystoscopes are more cost-effective if total cases performed is less than 1265 per year. Additional investigation into the cost-effectiveness of single-use cystoscopes as supplements in outpatient settings or primary endoscopes in inpatient/emergency settings should be performed.